The most benevolent king Bali, who had donated the whole earth to Lord Vishnu, disguised as a dwarf, had hundred sons. Banasura was his eldest son. He was intelligent, generous, and truthful and was respected for his qualities. He was also a great devotee of Lord Shiva.
Wednesday, August 31, 2005
Angrakshak
The most benevolent king Bali, who had donated the whole earth to Lord Vishnu, disguised as a dwarf, had hundred sons. Banasura was his eldest son. He was intelligent, generous, and truthful and was respected for his qualities. He was also a great devotee of Lord Shiva.
Aadhibhouthika Aadhyaathmika and Aadhidhaivika
Aadhyaathmika refers to sufferings caused by Vaatha [wind], Pittha [bile], and Kapha [phlegm]. Aadhidhaivika refers to the calamities caused to man by floods, drought, storms, earthquakes, and similar natural disasters.
The Lord is experienced as Sath-Chith-Aananda. Sath is Being, that which is eternally present. Chith is awareness (or consciousness). Chith is like water. When Sath (as sugar) is combined with Chith (as water) you have neither sugar not water, but syrup. The combination of Sath and Chith results in Aananda [Bliss]. When the unchanging, eternal Divinity unites with the changing and inert Prakrithi [nature], you have Aananda.
Aalingan
Mohini started dancing. First she put her hands on her hips and Bhasmasura did the same. Then she raised her hands to heaven and Bhasmasura copied her. Finally, she put her hand on her head. And Bhasmasura, whose eyes were constantly fixed upon Mohini's beautiful face, completely forgot about Lord Shiva's boon, and put his hand on his head too.There was a loud roar of thunder and the huge demon crumbled to ashes at her feet!What a relief it was to Lord Shiva! He at once appeared before Mohini and thanked her a lot for saving his life. The two embraced each other.
Ayyappa and Hanuman
Another slightly variant version of this story in the Shiva Purana states that when Vishnu once disguised himself as the heavenly beauty Mohini, her charms so impressed Shiva that he could not restrain his seed. Vayu then carried the seed and deposited it into Anjana's womb. There was no question of Shiva's potent discharge resulting in an offspring less than extraordinary and the child conceived under such exceptional circumstances was bound to be especial, and so it was. The resulting bundle of joy was none other than Hanuman, one of the most celebrated and worshipped figures in Indian thought. Two exceptional traits further marked his birth. The first was that unlike ordinary children, Hanuman was born wearing a loincloth. This was an early pointer to his life-long pursuit of a celibate, almost ascetic lifestyle. The other significant occurrence was the presence of elaborate earrings adorning his ears. The latter has an interesting piece of legend explaining it:
At the time of Hanuman's birth, the undisputed leader of the monkey-world was Vali, a strong and powerful ape. When Vali came to know that Anjana was pregnant with a child who was bound to develop into a powerful rival, he decided to end matters in Anjana's womb itself. He created a missile using five metals: gold, silver, copper, iron and tin. When the unsuspecting mother was asleep, he directed the missile into her womb. A normal child may have succumbed to this dastardly attack, but not one born of Shiva's fiery seed. The missile as soon as it touched Hanuman's body melted, and transformed into a pair of earrings. Thus wearing the trophies of his first battle, fought while still in his mother's womb, Hanuman gloriously entered this world.
The sight of his beloved son lying helpless in his arms infuriated the wind-god. He drew in a mighty breath and sucked away all the air from the cosmos. "Let all those who have harmed Anjana's son choke to death," he thought out aloud. Predictably there was panic in the cosmos. Without air, life on every level was threatened. The gods, realizing their folly, went in unison to Vayu and asked for his forgiveness. To make amends they showered the following blessings and powers on the monkey child:
a). Brahma: "May you live as long as Brahma himself lives."
b). Vishnu: "May you live all your life as the greatest devotee of God."
c). Indra: "No weapon of any kind will wound or hit your body."
d). Agni: "Fire will never affect you."
e). Kala: "May death never court you."
f). All the Devas (gods): "None will ever equal you in strength and speed."
Brahma concluded the session by bestowing on Hanuman a power greater than even Vayu and Garuda, and endowed him with a speed faster than even the mightiest wind. Thus pacified, Vayu restored air into the cosmos and Hanuman was returned to his parents.
There was one catch however. It was decreed that Hanuman would remain blissfully unaware of his own prowess, unless, during the course of a meritorious deed, his memory would remind him of his superhuman ability. It will be seen later how this apparently insignificant matter lays bare the symbolical significance of Hanuman.
Subsequent to the arrival of Manikantan, the queen was blessed with a child of her own. Both boys grew up as loving brothers. The time came to decide who would be the heir to the throne. While the King decided to pass the throne to Manikantan, the queen was slightly inclined to her own biological son. The general of army was also on her side. They decided to discreetly thwart King’s decision by tricking him. They approached the royal physician and enticed him with rewards so that he became an accomplice to the subterfuge. The queen pretended to have severe stomach ache. The physician approached the King and falsely convinced him of the seriousness of the queen’s condition and held that drinking of leopard's milk was the only remedy.
The King stood aghast at this incomprehensible remedy prescribed. "How could a leopard be approached for milk?" he asked, "And who would undertake such a dangerous mission?" Upon hearing this Manikantan agreed to undertake this mission to save his mother. The King did not, at first, relent to this request from his beloved son. However, after a series of talks Manikantan could convince his father and departed for the forest.
However before he could get the leopard's milk he had to perform the task for which his birth was ordained. Mahisasura was a terrible demon killed by the goddess Durga. Mahishasura’s cousin, the daughter of Karamba, decided to take revenge. Mahishi as she was known, first undertook severe penance and propitiated Lord Brahma and received a boon to the effect that she would not be killed by anyone born from a man-woman relation. If at all a child was born out of any other relation, he must live in a royal family for a minimum period of twelve years in an earthly kingdom before he could kill her. Then she attempted to seduce Indra, the King of the Demi-Gods. Lords Vishnu and Brahma created Datta, a male demon to divert the attention of Mahishi from Indra. The trick worked temporarily. On his way to get leopard's milk, Manikantan (born from Vishnu and Shiva) encountered Mahishi. After a long tough fight, Manikantan killed Mahishi near the river called Azhutha.
Actually Mahishi was Leela in a previous birth, who had been cursed to become a demoness. Leela came out of the dead body of Mahishi and bowed before Ayyappa with a request that he marry her. The Lord, who had embraced bachelorhood, rejected this. However Leela did not give up and remained at Malikappuram in the hope that Ayyappa would change his mind. A temple is dedicated to her there and worshippers of Ayyappa make it a point to pay their respects at Malikappuram as well.
Then Ayyappan managed to collect the milk of a leopard. Riding on a leopard, who is said to be Indra himself and surrounded by other leopards, he returned to the palace of Pandalam. The queen who watched this fantastic scene was shocked and dumbfounded. She realised her mistake and begged Ayyappa for forgiveness. Ayyappa forgave the queen mother and embraced his foster-father, the King. Blessing all, he shot an arrow that landed atop the Sabari Hills indicating the place where he would be seated. He left the Palace, and ascended the hill where he gave up his earthly body and his divine self returned to the heavens.
Aadishwar
Adi Nath visiting some devotees.
Rudreshwar riding over Nandi on a lot of distressed souls and thus liberating them.
Har Har Shambhu! Jai Shiva Shambhu!
Bom Bhole!
Devotees shouting loud on seeing their Aradhya.
Cosmic Ganga Descending into Shiva's matted locks.
Rudra being born from Brahma's forehead
Shiva comes to visit a devotee and grant him the wish of his life, the sight of Shiva's Divine Form.
Tuesday, August 30, 2005
Arjuneshwar
Arjuna's encounter with Shiva is celebrated at Tiruvetkalam near Chidambaram - Tamilnadu.
Kiraata Murthy is also revered at Kumbhakonam (Tamilnadu) , where it is believed that an arrow from Shiva's bow pierced the pot containing the celestial nectar amritam, and spilled it into the Mahamagam tank.
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Anuchar
According to a Tamil temple lore, the sage Bhringi wanted to circumambulate Shiva. Shakti stopped him saying, “You must go around both of us because each of us is incomplete without the other.” Bhringi was adamant. To foil his plans, Shakti sat on Shiva’s lap. Bhringi took the form of a bee and tried to fly between them. So Shakti fused her body with Shiva’s and became his left half. Shiva now came to be known as Ardha-nari (the half-woman god). Bhringi then took the form of a worm and tried to bore a hole between them. Exasperated by his stubbornness, Gauri said, “If you only want him then may you be deprived of every tissue that a human gets from a woman.” Instantly, Bhringi was transformed into a skeleton. His body possessed neither flesh, nor bones, nor genitals. He could not even stand. Feeling sorry for him, Shiva game him a third leg so that he could stand up like a tripod. Bhringi apologized to Shakti having realized the complementary relationship between the God and Goddess.
Bhringi is often depicted as a skeleton in most images, this is because Parvati having noticed that Bhringi did not go around her, cursed him in fury to become thin and completely emaciated, so weak that he could not stand. Shiva, moved by Bhringi's plight, gave a 3rd leg for support.
Another Legend Goes:
After defeating Andhak's army, Lord Shiva immediately down from Nandi's back and attacked Andhak with his trident, which pierced his chest. Even after being seriously injured, Andhak did not die instead he pulled Lord Shiva for one mile holding him tightly in his clutch. Lord Shiva tried to resist by attacking for the second time. But Andhak retaliated by hitting Shiva with his mace causing serious injury on his head. A stream of blood oozed out from the wound, which poured down towards all the four directions. The blood stream which poured down towards east resulted into the manifestation of Bhairav named Kaalraj. Similarly, Kamaraj, Chakramala, Somaraj, Swachcharaj, Lalitraj and Vighnaraj manifested from the other three directions. Lord Shiva then lifted Andhak above his head with the help of his trident, which was still pierced in Andhak's chest. His body had become red due to the blood oozing out from Andhak's wound. Lord Shiva had toiled hard to kill Andhak and as a result, he was perspiring profusely. The sweat drops originating from Shiva's forehead resulted into the manifestation of a divine girl while the sweat drops that fell on the ground from Shiva's face resulted into the manifestation of a divine boy. Both the children started gulping down the blood emanating from Andhak's wound. Lord Shiva named the girl child as Charchika while the boy child was named Mangal and blessed both of them. Lord Shiva held Andhak above his head for 1000 divine years, which reduced his body to a skeleton. At last, Andhak realised his mistake and begged for forgiveness. He eulogised Lord Shiva and hailed his greatness. Lord Shiva told him that he would forgive him only when he accepts Parvati as his mother. Andhak agreed not only to accept Parvati as his mother but also Shiva as his father. Shiva became pleased and lowered down his trident. He healed Andhak's wound by his divine touch. The deities became pleased at Andhak's change of heart and blessed him. Lord Shiva then took Andhak to Mandaar Mountain. Parvati was still hiding behind the bushes. When she saw Lord Shiva approaching, she recognised him and called her companions to come out from their hiding. Lord Shiva gleefully told Parvati that Andhak had now become her slave. "Look at him. He is making salutations to you. Accept him as your son. Andhak then eulogised Parvati with complete devotion. Parvati became pleased and expressed her desire to bless him with a boon. Andhak said- "I don't want anything. I just want to become liberated from all my sins and remain in the proximity of Lord Shiva." Parvati blessed him and made him the Gana of Shiva who became famous as Bhringi.
Aapar bhakti
Nandanar is a saint extolled in the periyapurana, a saiva siddhanta scripture. In a village, engaged in the trade of selling the carcasses of the cow and tending his landlord's farm was an unusual person. He had great love for Lord Shiva. He was desperate to visit a temple, Thiruppunkoor. This place is situated a mile away from the famous vaidheeswaran temple, around a hour's journey from Chidambaram (Thillai). [Lord Shiva has kindly permitted me to visit this temple many times] However, his landlord would not allow him to go despite frequent requests. Finally, one day in frustration, the landlord said, 'If you can till all the 40 acres of land in a single day, you can go.' This impossible feat was done by Lord Shiva itself overnight enabling Nandanar to visit the temple. Since Nandanar (who belonged to a lower caste by birth) could not enter the temple and see the Lord, the Nandi moved a good 2-3 feet (which is seen as such to the present day). With the movement of the Nandi, he could see Lord Shiva despite standing outside the temple. Sekkizhar in periyapuranam says that Lord Shiva asked Nandi to move. The tank in the temple was built by Nandanar.
The story of Nandanar attaining mukti is, however, a great tale. After Nandanar returned to his village, he wanted to go to Thillai but he was caught up in his work. He expressed his desire for Thillai to everyone, and slowly people started asking him every day, 'When are you leaving for Thillai ?' He used to say 'Tomorrow I will go.' It is said that his name became 'Naalai' because he used to say Tomorrow every time. Finally, one day he decided to leave. Because of his low caste (parrayan), he used to go to the top of every street in Thillai and stand and shout 'Varuhalamo' (May I come in ?) The high caste people would close their doors and stay inside till he crossed the street.
Still, Nandanar was very afraid to enter the temple and stayed in the city. The song 'Varuhalaamo (May I come)' is very beautiful. The second stanza goes, 'You are the treasure of the compassion, are you not ? This parrayan, is he fit to pay you compliments ? To see your blissful dance, May I come in ? O Thillai Varadaa One who can extinguish my feverish longing (of seeing you) May I come in ?' Shiva taking pity on him came in the dreams of many brahmins and told them there was a superior bhakta. And that the brahmins were to construct a fire and Nandanar would enter and come out unscathed. Therefore the Brahmins built a huge fire and called nandanar to cross the fire. The story says that he crossed the fire without any burns and entered the temple, but did not come out of the temple, because he merged into the Lord Nataraja there. This story has not been told in periyapuranam in detail but Bharatiyar brings the cruel situation of casteism /racism between people and shows how the Lord does not look for the jati but only prema. Such is the Lila of Lord Shiva, who has no equal.
Aari
This legend relates to the story of Shiva's protecting Markandeya from the clutches of death.
Mrikandu Munivar worshipped Shiva and sought from him the boon of begetting a son. He was given the choice between a gifted son with a short lived tenure on earth or a dunce with a long life. Mrikandu Munivar chose the former, and was blessed with Markandeya, an exemplary son, destined to die at the age of 16.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Abhinav
Sunday, August 21, 2005
Anek Rupam Ekam Shivam-II
This piece has a very unique style to it. There are many examples of Shiva in this form however never have we seen him quite like this. He is tall and thin. His hips, unlike other examples of Shiva, are thin and manly rather than womanly. His face has a lean, long and has a youthful appearance. Shiva looks like a true Indian thin man!
His legs are long and thin. There is some oxidation on his legs which add to the character of the piece. Oxidation is natural and is not damaging the piece.
In this pose Shiva is known as Vinadhara (translated "Veena Player"), the Lord of Music. A title he borrows from Saraswati. The pose is called is called "Veena Player" because Shiva's two front hands are in the position they would be if he was playing a veena or guitar. The veena is missing as it is in all Vinadhara sculpture.
In Shiva's other two hands he holds an axe as well as a deer. The deer shows how all animals see Shiva as their lord and revere him.
On the Tiruvadiral festival day, Shiva comes forth from the main shrine in the guise of a beggar. the iconographic form of this bronze is known as Bhikshatana or Enchanting Mendicant, and it refers to a well-known narrative of Shiva's manifestation in the Pine Forest hermitage. In order to convert a group of Vedic forest-dwellers to a more efficacious form of worship, the story goes, Shiva once took on the appearance of a naked, ash-smeared beggar and showed up unexpectantly in their ashram. Despite his unprepossessing appearance, the mendicant proved irresistible to the wives of the Pine Forest sages. The women sang, danced and clung to him in erotic abandon. Failing to recognize the disguised deity, and enraged by this invasion of their austere lives, the sages tried to attack the beggar, but all their curses and sacrificial weapons were useless against the god. Finally, in a verbal confrontation, Shiva tore off and threw down his penis (linga) before the astonished hermits and disappeared. In the end, the sages became successful practitioners of the new rites of worshipping the Shiva-linga.
According to tradition, the ultimate boon sought by a Siva devotee is that he be set free from the shackles of life and allowed to remain forever in the presence of Siva. While granting this boon, Siva assumes the form of Vrishavahana, appearing to the devotee in the company of his consort with his diving vehicle, the bull Nandi. (Bull and Uma are missing from the sculpture.)
The sublime Siva has his body bent in a flowing curve. His right hand once rested on the missing Bull. His lower garment is fastened to the waist with a broad band; his matted locks swirl around his head arranged like a turban, and his eyes shine with inward joy.
Ananda Tandava-II
The sculpture of Kali captures her utter dismay and alarm at loosing the dance compettion.
Shiva's sculpture captures his victory over his beloved consort.
It is an amazing technical act that the metal artist could portray Shiva dancing with one leg thrown up and barely balancing on the tow of the other and still preserve the absolute beauty of the dance proportionally and with restraint. It should be considered a marvel.
Kali was the patron goddess of Thillai Forest. Lord Shiva came to the forest to dance for two of his devotees Patanjali and Vyaaghrapaada who worshipped the svayambhu-linga, now in the inner sanctum of the temple. Kali challenged Shiva to a dancing contest on the condition that the loser had to leave the forest. The contest was judged by Lord Vishnu. The dance contest went on for hours with every one of Shiva's dance postures being matched by Kali. Shiva performed a posture with his left leg lifted over his head in the Ananda Tandava exposing his genital area. Kali, being a respectable woman, was unable to go into this compromising position. Thus, Kali admitted defeat and left the forest.
Aradhya-II
Shiva is a contemporary sculptural marvel. Looking into the eyes of this piece is like staring into the eyes of Shiva himself. The detached and aloof expression on his handsome, boyish face show him to be a true King of Gods.
In five of his eight hands he holds a noose, mace, drum, cobra and trident. The trident represents the Hindu trinity of Brahma, Shiva and Vishnu. It is also said to represent the threefold qualities of nature: creation, preservation and destruction. He holds a cobra symbolizing the power he has over the most deadly of creatures. Snakes are also used to symbolize the Hindu dogma of reincarnation. The drum represents the rhythmic sound to which Shiva dances and ceaselessly recreates the universe.
The front left hand is in the abhaya-mudra, the "fear not" gesture, made by holding the palm outward with fingers pointing up. The front right arm is across the chest in the gahahasta (elephant trunk) pose, with the wrist limp and the fingers pointed downward toward the demon Apasmara.
The contrasting elements of the rough (gray) stone and the polished (dark) stone bring an added element to the beautiful piece. All the fine details are rough cut giving them a gray appearance. From Shiva's ornate headdress, his hair, earrings, rudraksha beads around his neck, bangles, lotus flower on his palm, his loin cloth down to the fine details on the demon Apasmara are all carved wonderfully in rough cut stone. This contrasts beautifully with all Shiva's skin which is polished to be a darker color.
Even the fine form of Apasmara is carved to perfection. He seems to be squirming under the weight of Shiva as he holds his cobra. His little legs writhe as his two short fangs protrude in discomfort caused by Shiva as he dances his "ignorant" form away.
The dancing form or Shiva is wonderful! This pose has all the grace of a Nataraja sculpture. Shiva seems to balance on the head of the elephant with his one leg as the other is lifted up as though he were skipping. His body is thrown back in ecstasy with his arms spread out in a fan of seeming joy. His fangs are exposed showing him to be terrifying. Shiva again displays his dualistic nature by being both joyous and terrifying at the same time.
The surrounding carcass of the elephant is a marked contrast from the Nataraja sculpture's cosmic arch. Look at the large "O" that is formed by the elephants tail on top of the piece. In his left hand he holds a cobra, and a scalp. In his right hand he holds a Dhamru or drum, which is a symbol of the beat in which creation takes place, a knife and trident. Shiva's trident is a symbol of the Hindu trinity of Shiva, Brahma and Vishnu. His remaining two hands are holding the fiery carcass of the elephant.
This sculpture is called Gajasamharam - Shiva Dancing on elephant, in Tamil.
The Stories Behind the Sculpture:
In Varanasi, India there was a demon in the form of an elephant who was harassing the saints and devotees of Shiva during their prayer. Shiva then destroyed the elephant-demon for the lack of respect. Thus the name, Gajasamharam, Sanskrit for "Killing the Elephant."
Another story with Shiva battling an elephant is part of the story of the Nataraja. There were rishis and priests living in the forest known as 'Tharukavanam', they became very arrogant as they had mastered all the 'Vedas', 'Agamas' and 'Shastras' and could raise powerful creatures from the sacrificial fires to do their bidding. Lord Shiva wished to show these rishis their limitations and appeared as a handsome mendicant with Vishnu as his wife 'Mohini'. This created chaos in 'Tharukavanam' as the wives of the rishis fell under the spell of this charming, handsome mendicant while the youthful rishis fell for the allure of Mohini. The older rishis became very angry and wanted to destroy the pair. They raised a sacrificial fire, 'Homam', from which appeared a tiger which was directed at the pair. Lord Shiva killed the tiger, peeled off its skin and tied it around his waist. They raised an elephant which they sent against Lord Shiva, which Shiva destroyed. Then the rishis produced a poisonous serpent, which Lord Shiva caught and wore around his neck. The rishis also sent a demon, 'Muyalakan', against Lord Shiva whom he crushed under his feet. Then the rishis sent the sacrificial fire against him which he put on his left hand. The rishis having lost the fire sent the Vedic 'mantras' which the Lord wore around his ankles. At this the rishis conceded defeat and the Lord revealed himself by dancing the 'Oorthava thandavam' with his matted hair unfurling in all eight directions and the world reverberating to his steps.
"May this obeisance be directed to the Blessed Dakshinamurti to Him who takes the guise of the auspicious Guru, to Him whose eight-fold Form is this entire motionless and mobile cosmos, manifesting as earth, water, fire, air, ether, the sun, the moon and the soul; beyond whom, all-pervading and supreme, there exists nothing else for those who truly search!"
Dakshinamurti is Shiva in his aspect as the universal teacher, teaching the secrets of yoga, tantras, yantras, alchemy, magic, occult knowledge, arts and sciences, ancient history or knowledge of the future to the sages and saints, gods and goddesses and his highly qualified devotees. Shiva teaches sitting on the snowy mountains of the Himalayas. He faces south towards the Indian subcontinent. Dakshinamurti literally translated means "south Facing Lord" The southern direction is an auspicious direction to face. By Shiva teaching with his body pointed to the southern direction he is basically showing to everyone that he is a god and thus above any worldly traditions.
The images of Dakshinamurti, depict Shiva in his pleasant mood, seated on a high rock seat, with one leg folded while the other rests on the Apasmarapurusha, the deluded self. Two of his arms hold a snake or drum or both in one hand and fire in the other. The snake is a symbol of tantric knowledge and the fire symbol of enlightenment. His remaining right hand is in abhayamudra posture of assurance and the other holds a copy of scripture in gnanamudra posture of presenting knowledge.
There is an interesting legend behind the conception of Shiva as Nataraja: In a dense forest in South India, there dwelt multitudes of heretical sages. Thither proceeded Shiva to confute them, accompanied by Vishnu disguised as a beautiful woman. The sages were at first led to violent dispute amongst themselves, but their anger was soon directed against Shiva, and they endeavored to destroy him by means of incantations. A fierce tiger was created in sacrificial fires, and rushed upon him; but smiling gently, he seized it and, with the nail of his little finger, stripped off its skin, and wrapped it about himself like a silken cloth. Undiscouraged by failure, the sages renewed their offerings, and produced a monstrous serpent, which however Shiva seized and wreathed about his neck like a garland. Then he began to dance; but there rushed upon him a last monster in the shape of a malignant dwarf. Upon him the god pressed the tip of his foot, and broke the creature’s back, so that it writhed upon the ground; and so, his last foe prostrate, Shiva resumed the dance.
Shiva is dancing on a dwarf-demon. The demon’s name is Apasmara-Purusha, the name when translated into English means a forgetful and lazy demon. The demon is supposed to be highly ignorant and a trouble creator. He was causing lots of problems to people and they prayed to Shiva to save them from the demon’s bad deeds. Shiva appears on the world and kills him. Apasmara-Purusha is a symbol of laziness, forgetfulness, bad feelings, and evil thoughts that all of us have within us. The important message in this story is not whether a demon by the name Apasmara-Purusha existed or whether a god called Shiva appeared on the world and killed him and then danced on him. It is a symbol to communicate to us a greater message -- get rid of your dark thoughts – jealousy, envy, hatred and laziness. If you do so, you will live happily and peacefully. This is a message that appealed to the ancient Hindus and it is a message that is useful to us even today, after thousands of years later. The Shiva’s dance is just an attractive way to convey this message.
Shiva is captured dancing in ecstasy upon his vehicle Nandi. His ten arms are spread out like the rays of the sun amplifying the energy Shiva is releasing upon those in his presence. In eight of his ten arms he holds various weapons and snakes, the most notable is the large sword raised above his head menacingly, warning anything that would challenge his supreme power.
Nandi stands unflinching, his head looking up to his master, Shiva, under his heavy foot. The large hump in his back is wrinkled with the weight of Shiva's foot. The folds of extra skin hanging loosely under his neck give the bull added realism.
The awesome base boasts 13 figures. Included among them are Shiva's sons Skanda and Ganesh as well as numerous other devotees among them Nandikeshvar, the human form of Shiva's vehicle, Nandi. On the arch next to one of Shiva's right hands is Lakshmi riding her vehicle, the owl.
A wonderful statue of Shiva with 6 arms dancing on Apasmara the dwarf of ignorance with Nandikeshvar. Nandikeshvar is Shiva's white bull, Nandi in human form. The details of the piece are very impressive especially Shiva's elaborate demon faced trident as well as the serpent adorning the rear of the sculpture.
The light green veins of stone that are on both sides of the base contrast beautifully with the rich red hue of the stone.
Aakar
Once from the primordial waters issued forth a fiery lingam, composed of an awesome column of flames. This occurrence took place between the end of one cosmic cycle and the beginning of the next. Seemingly endless, this awe-inspiring sight perplexed both Vishnu and Brahma. Deciding to investigate its origins and end, Brahma took the form of a swan and rose upwards to look for its zenith, while Vishnu transformed into a boar and dove into the waters. Brahme flew higher and higher, but couldn't reach its summit, Vishnu too was not successful in reaching the bottom of this cosmic linga. Ultimately both returned to their starting pint without solving its mystery. When they both discussed their attempts, Vishnu conceded his lack of success, while Brahma untruthfully claimed that he had successfully reached the highest point. To support his claim, he presented the Ketaki flower as a witness, who falsely testified that she had witnessed Brahma' success, as she was falling down the heavens.
While they were so conversing, the linga itself burst open and the Great Lord Shiva sprung forth before them. His indeed was the omnipotent presence which even the combined mights of both Vishnu and Shiva could not fathom. But Shiva, at this moment was incensed at the falsehoods uttered by both the Ketaki flower and Brahma. He cursed Ketaki saying that her flowers would never be used in his worship, and to Brahma he directed the curse of no worship. Indeed to this day, a temple dedicated exclusively to Brahma is hard to come by, and the Ketaki flower, even though luxuriously fragrant, is never used in the worship of Shiva.
Here Shiva is seen adored by both Vishnu and Brahma, and asserting his supremacy over them. The painting's central axis is dominated by the vertical linga, made up of tiers of red and gold flames.
The five-headed, eight-armed Shiva sits majestically in a yogic posture against the backdrop of the linga. A right arm blesses Brahma, and the corresponding left, Vishnu. The gods are seen acknowledging Shiva's supremacy with a bow. Ketaki, the fragrant flower is deified as a Devi, and can be seen below the figure of Vishnu.
Saturday, August 20, 2005
Abhinay
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Ajanma
~Shvetashvatara Upanishad
There are many stories in the Puranas about the origin of Rudra. According to the Vishnu Purana, at the beginning of this kalpa Brahma wanted a child and meditated for one. Presently, a child appeared on his lap and started crying. When asked by Brahma why he was crying, the child replied that it was because he did not have a name. Brahma then named him Rudra, meaning "howler". However the child cried seven more times and was given seven more names. Shiva therefore has eight forms: Rudra, Sharva, Bhava, Ugra, Bhima, Pashupati, Ishana, and Mahadeva, which, according to the Shiva Purana, correspond to the earth, water, fire, wind, sky, a yogi called Kshetragya, the sun, and the moon respectively.
Avaran
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
Ardhanarishwara
Ardhanarishwara - often referred to as a hermaphrodite or androgynous deity, is one of the principal forms of Shiva. In this essay, I will examine the mythographic dimensions of this deity, and in doing so, discuss the related issue of magical androgyny, particularly within the context of Indian magic & myth. I will also attempt to make some suggestions for appropriate forms of sadhana for magical work with Ardhanarishwara.
Ardhanarishwara is described by Daniélou and others as an primordial androgynous deity. The sacred androgyne, both as a deity, and as the human being who crosses or otherwise blurs the gender-divide are related. Daniélou for instance, notes that homosexuals, hermaphrodites and transvestites can be considered sacred beings - "images" of Ardhanarishwara.
One: Cosmic Creation
The Mahabharata tells us that Brahma failed in his early attempts to create mortals who would both create offspring carnally, and later, die. His mind-born sons were ascetic sages. And, according to the Shiva Purana, Brahma lacked the power to create women. When Rudra sprang forth from his brow, Brahma chose him to create mortals. There are a variety of myths relating to Rudras' responses to the request of Brahma. In one version of this myth-cycle, Brahma created the goddess Gauri to be the wife of Rudra. Rudra was initially pleased by this, but when Brahma asked him to beget progeny, he submerged himself in the waters and performed austerities for thousands of years. When at last, Rudra emerged, he castrated himself, and set his linga ('sign') free. It became a fiery pillar - a sign of cosmic potential. Rudra's actions can be understood as a metaphor for the creation of the manifest Universe. He first withdraws into himself, indicating the formless nature of the Great God, in samadhi. By his action of self-castration, he reveals the sign - the nature - of the Manifest Universe, in relation to that which is Unmanifested.
Following these two stages in the cosmic creative process, it is said that Rudra became the mind-born son of Brahma, issuing forth from Brahma's head in the form of Ardhanarishwara - "the Lord whose half is woman" - the right half male, the left half, female. On seeing the Supreme Lord (Shiva), Brahma practised austerities. (It is also said that Ardhanarishwara was terrible to behold, and that Brahma could not look upon him, or was burned by the fire of his radiance.) This form, for Brahma, held the potential for becoming a couple that could unite sexually.
Pleased by Brahma's austerities, the Great God divided himself. The Great Goddess, Sati ('the Real') became manifest, (i.e. the 'image' of the Great Goddess) for the sake of the world. All shaktis sprang forth from the Great Goddess.
Thus Ardhanarishwara manifested the 'signs' of both sexes as the prime cause of creation in the world. Also, in taking the form of Ardhanarishwara, Shiva revealed himself, for the first time, in wholly anthropomorphic features.
Taking the process of creation further, both manifest god and goddess continued to divide themselves. From Shiva came the eleven Rudras - the eleven 'vital breaths' who carried the fiery essence of Rudra into all forms of life. It is said that Shiva requested that the Great Goddess divide herself into two aspects - black and white - from which sprang the infinite Shaktis, or female powers.
One should note however, that no progeny issued from the union of Shiva and Sati - neither mortals nor immortals. It is said that, having discharged Ardhanarishwara from his brow, Brahma performed a similar operation on himself, dividing himself into a progenitive couple, Manu and Satarupa, whose issue represented the various conditions, qualities and activities of the total human condition.
Ardhanarishwara exists without desire. He is a complete form - a single unity. It was by Brahma's command (i.e. Brahma's desire to create beings capable of sexual procreation) that Ardhanarishwara divided to become God and Goddess. Shiva divided himself and let his Shakti (his power) be apprehended separately by both himself and Brahma. The body of fire, of which erotic pleasure is the sparks, was divided. The Great Goddess sent her glowing ardour, in the form of a woman, into the world of the gods. Thus from Ardhanarishwara's self-division came the essential idea of woman, sex, and sensuality. Thus duality came into the world.
Following the act of differentiation, the Supreme Goddess re-entered Ardhanarishwara, once more becoming a timeless, ceaseless image, an image which contains in one body the possibility for sexual awareness of both sexes.
"The great god, Maheshvara, never delights with a wife distinct from his own self ... The joy within him is called the Goddess."
Kurma Purana, quoted in Stella Kramrisch, 1981
The Desire to Create
In the Artharva Veda, Lust or Kama is given as the supreme divinity - the impeller of creation. "Lust was born first. Neither gods nor Ancestors nor men can equal him." In the creation hymn of the Rg Veda, Kama (desire) is the first seed of mind, from which came the entire Creation. It is the arrows of Kama which, in the primordial beginning, inspire Brahma with the passion and lust for creation. Thus Kama is the primal urge of life to become embodied in form. It is the effect of Kama upon Brahma which leads to the manifestation and the division of Ardhanarishwara.
Iconography of the image
Images of Ardhanarishwara are notable as they are examples of a vertical (rather than the more common horizontal) fusion of male & female characteristics. However, this fusion is not entirely balanced. Some images of Ardhanarishwara possess half a lingam, but the primary emblem of femininity is always the breast, rather than the vagina.
Two: Gender-bending as sadhana
The Mythological Dimension
The Mahabharata
Arjuna, one of the epic heroes of the Mahabharata, is claimed by contemporary Hijras as one of their mythic forebears. Arjuna, the fiercest of the Pandava warriors, spends a year dressed as a member of the 'third sex' living in a harem, teaching women the arts of song and dance.
"Yudhishthira said: 'And what office will be performed by that mighty descendant of the Kurus?' Arjuna replied: 'O Lord of the Earth, I will declare myself as one of the neuter sex. O monarch, it is indeed, difficult to hide the marks of the bow-string on my arms. I will, however, cover both my cicatrized arms with bangles. Wearing brilliant rings on my ears and conch-bangles on my wrists and causing a braid to hang down from my head, I will, O king, appear as one of the third sex. Vrihannala by name."
A further tale from the Mahabharata is that of King Bangasvana, who was changed into a woman by the god Indra, whom he had offended. According to the Mahabharata, the king implored Indra to remain as a woman, having found the affection and pleasure that women experience, preferable to the state of manhood.
The Ramayana
It is recounted, in various versions of the Ramayana that a King named Ila, whilst out hunting in a forest, entered an area that was sacred to Shiva. In order to please Parvati, Shiva assumed the shape of a woman and correspondingly, all male creatures in the forest became female, including the king and his retinue. Ila was filled with fear when he realised that his change had been brought about by Shiva. The king then entered the grove where Shiva and Parvati were at play. Shiva allowed Ila to ask for any boon except that of manhood. The king however, addressed himself to Paravati. The Devi gave Ila the boon that he would live half his life as a woman, and half as a man. King Ila suggested to the Devi that he might live as a beautiful woman for one month, and as a man for the next month. The Goddess agreed, but decreed that, whilst male, he would not remember his female form, and whilst female, he would not remember his male form. It is further told that, whilst wandering as a woman, Ila encountered Budha (the planet Mercury), who sought her as his wife. Budha made love to Ila, and she bore him a son, after which Budha petitioned Shiva (with a horse sacrifice) to restore Ila to manhood permanently.
Shiva and Vishnu
Alain Daniélou, in "Gods of Love and Ecstasy" recounts the myth of Shiva's union with Vishnu, whilst the latter had taken the form of Mohini, the Enchantress. Vishnu, as Mohini, was resting by the ocean of milk when 'she' was approached by Shiva, who expressed the desire to unite with Vishnu. Vishnu, it is said, demurred, saying that union between two persons of the same sex was 'unfruitful'. It seems that Vishnu-Mohini finally submitted to Shiva, as, depending on the version, the 'sap' that they spilled became the river Ganges, a son named Arikaraputtiran, or that the Seven Sages took the fallen seed and poured it into Anjani, the daughter of Gautama, who subsequently gave birth to the monkey-god, Hanuman. In other versions of this myth, it is this coupling which leads to the birth of Skanda.
Gender-bending saints
In Kali's Child: The Mystical and the Erotic in the Life and Teachings of Ramakrishna, author Jeffrey J. Kripal discusses Ramakrishna's injunction that, in order to approach a God, the male devotee should take on a female identity. Ramakrishna paired his male disciples up into 'masculine' and 'feminine' couples. According to his teachings, these 'spiritual' genders result in different types of religious experience, the object of the gender-assignation being to awaken desire and devotional love. According to Ramakrishna's teachings, everyone in the world is 'female' in relation to the divine. According to the biographer Datta, Ramakrishna was taught by one of his tantric friends that "if one is to know the Man, one must take the state of the Woman - as a Female friend, as a handmaiden, or as a mother."
Ramakrishna spent long periods in a 'handmaid state' - one such period being whilst living in the household of his temple boss, Mathur, and fanning the image of the Goddess with the women of the household. Ramakrishna's biographer Datta records that Mathur would buy Ramakrishna women's clothes, shawls and jewelry for him, and dress Ramakrishna with his own hands. The saint is reputed to have experienced a vision of Radha immediately after Mathur gave Ramakrishna some feminine garments to wear. Another biographer, Saradananda says that Ramakrishna's cross-dressing, and Mathur's gifts caused some people to make "scandalous" interpretations of Ramakrishna's "renunciation." Datta also recounts that Mathur often took Ramakrishna from the temple to his home. On one such occasion, Ramakrishna felt that he had become Sita and that the demon Ravana (i.e. Mathur) was kidnapping him, whereupon he entered samadhi. Kripal notes that the abduction of Sita, the faithful wife of Rama, as told in the Ramayana, implies a sexual abduction. Kripal says that, by assuming this mythological paradigm, Ramakrishna was able to deal with a traumatic event, and also preserve his own 'purity'. The implication here of course, is that there was some degree of homosexual relationship between Ramakrishna and Mathur. Sarananda claims that Ramakrishna's cross-dressing was a conscious Sadhana which enabled the Master to discover nonduality that lies beyond conditioned gender.
Ramakrishna often imitated the mannerisms of women, in order to "conquer lust." The logic, as Kripal explains it, is that since sexual desire can only exist between man and woman, then if a man can 'become' a woman, his 'desire' for women will disappear. However, Kripal reveals the secret of Ramakrishna in that: "As a woman, Ramakrishna was ascetic to women and erotic to men" (p234). Kripal goes on to say that 'becoming a woman' for Ramakrishna, inflamed his desire for men, and male deities. Whilst 'being' a woman, Ramakrishna sang to his boy disciples, nursed them at his breasts, and fondled them in his lap. Particular disciples were said to be 'masculine' in relation to the Saint's 'feminine' nature. According to Ramakrishna, the effeminate actors of Bengal, skilled in mimicking the mannerisms of women, should be considered role models for the male devotee.
It is Kripal's contention that the Saint's bouts of samadhi should be interpreted contextually - on the one hand, Ramakrishna entered mystical states as an escape from the threatening sexual presence of women, whilst on the other hand, he experiences bliss whilst looking at the cocked hips of a beautiful English boy. The homoerotic dimension of Ramakrishna's life has hitherto remained hidden, whilst his tendency to enter samadhi at the sight of a woman has been interpreted as evidence of his saintliness. Whilst it may be true that Ramakrishna worshipped the Divine Feminine Principle - as a desexualised mother, able to grant Jnana (Gnosis), he feared and reviled earthly women who entangled men in the entrapments of maya - becoming a householder, having children, etc. Kripal says that Ramakrishna was "absolutely terrified of the polluting substances of the female body and the contact with them that sexual intercourse inevitably brings."
The Hijra
There are an estimated 50,000 Hijra in contemporary India. Hijra are defined as males who lack male sex-organs, from birth or, as is more common, through castration at an early age. It is thought that the Hijra cult may go back over three thousand years and before the arrival of the British, they had begging rights and land grants from both Hindu and Muslim rulers. They identify as being neither male nor female, but of a 'third nature' (Sanskrit: trhytiyam prakrhytim). Hijra are often regarded with a mixture of disgust, fear, and awe. It is believed that they have the power to foretell the future, bring rain, or utter fearful curses. In modern India, they often appear at wedding ceremonies, offering a blessing which bestows fertility on newlyweds. Many contemporary hijra resort to prostitution, and they are also infamous for their lewd public behaviour. Sociological studies of hijra prostitution indicate that some Indian men 'prefer' sex with hijra as they will consent to sexual practices which women are reluctant to engage in. Interviews with hijras conducted by Serena Nanda (1990) indicate that those who chose to become hijra did so due to their homosexuality: "We dress like girls because of the sexual desire for men." For some hijra, the element of choice does not exist, as young boys are castrated and sold to pimps - a practice which seems to have increased in recent years, according to an article in 'India Today'.
Jeffrey Kripal, in his deconstruction of Ramakrishna's biographies, concludes that it is likely that Ramakrishna had an encounter with two hijra whilst visiting Kartabhaja - a tantric community headed by one Vaishnavacharan, who taught that one can worship God in a living man. It seems that this community was made up of homoerotically-inclined males, hijra, and women. Ramakrishna himself records that Vaishnavacharan liked to look at pictures of men, for they aroused in him feelings of tenderness and love. Ramakrishna, it seems, used a similar technique. Interestingly enough, in view of the 'third state' of the hijra, Kripal recounts that, when asked by a disciple whether he was a man or a woman, the saint replied with a smile, "I don't know."
Three: The Androgyne
Androgyne - Greek - Andre=man, guné=woman
Ardhanarishvara is acceptable as a stone image, but would look extremely strange as a living being. Ziggy Stardust is an acceptable androgyne, but are heavily-muscled female body-builders? A man with breasts is a common mythical and, largely thanks to modern hormone therapy, an increasingly encountered 'real' phenonemon, but is a morphological woman with a cock a comfortable image? Or a male with a vagina, for that matter? It seems that the image of the androgyne, when it appears, must be acceptable to men and women, but within the confines of a male definition of what is appropriately feminine.
My core disagreement with the whole modern concept of androgyny (at least in the post-Jungian sense) is that 'masculine' and 'feminine' attributes are culturally imposed (in my view anyway). Men can be 'intuitive' and women can be 'logical' without necessarily becoming androgynous. Equally, I've met drag queens who like to fuck and leathermen who's legs fly up like they were on balloons. I also feel that it's too simplistic to transpose androgynous figures from myth directly into 'real' life. As O'Flaherty says, in Indian mythology, there is no difficulty about 'men becoming women', but the Indian psyche has severe problems with women who are too 'masculine'. I've felt for a long time that the Androgyny thing doesn't really speak to women, as it were. I've met several 'Drag Kings' over the years - there was a much-celebrated incident when a whole group of them 'invaded' the 'Mineshaft' - a leather bar in Manchester, and had lots of fun with their whips and dildoes - causing much horror and shock when they revealed this to the men afterwards. I feel that they wouldn't immediately be recognised as androgynous, though. It seems to me that there is a vast difference between assuming a mythical posture of 'androgyny' and the playful transgression and blurring of sex-roles which happens in the modern sexual sub-cultures. It's also, I feel, an over-simplification to look at some tribal or ancient culture, find a role which seems to fit the androgyny theory, and then apply it globally to contemporary experience. The Lakota Winkte and the cross-dressing Siberian Shaman are worlds apart from the 'cock in a frock' at the Porchester or Torture Garden.
When men 'become' women, I often feel that they are acting out their own projections of how they think women behave - at least this has been my observation with most of the male-female transsexuals I have met. A comment that has stuck in my mind over the years was from a man who said he preferred transsexuals because they were more 'feminine' than modern (i.e. 'liberated') women. Ramakrishna's feints at becoming 'feminine' were, after all, a means for him to heighten his erotic attraction to other men - the only means open to him in a culture which kept homosexuality under the carpet. If androgyny is indeed a metaphor for the integration of male & female attributes, then we cannot really say that Ramakrishna was an androgynous individual in this sense.
The Dissolution of Categories
As the creation myth indicates, Ardhanishvara does not engage in procreation of mortals. The Great Goddess temporarily emerges from Ardhanishvara, in order to fill the universe full of Shakti. Ardhanishvara is an expression of the nondual - of the bliss of samadhi wherein there is no difference made between one thing or another. All that exists flows from, and at the same time is, the union of Shiva-Shakti as represented by the image of Ardhanishvara - the primordial union which is beyond the categories of form and gender. Ardhanishvara is both sensuous, yet also a passive figure - hinting at resolution, harmony and balance.
The dissolution of categories through sadhana is a central and enduring theme in Tantric magic. This dissolution is both transcendent and immanent. The goal of the Tantric sadhu is not so much to transcend the world of form, but to immerse himself in it, all the better to enjoy the love-play of the Goddess. In the image of All that exists flows from, and at the same time is, the union of Shiva-Shakti as represented by the image of Ardhanishvara, the twin poles of Tantric sadhana, renunciation and erotic bliss, are united. The route to superconsciousness - "the realisation that everything is alive and significant" (as William S. Burroughs put it), or, in the words of Ramakrishna, "She Herself has become Everything", requires both asceticism and erotic union. Shiva is both the Mahayogi and the lover of the Goddess, spending thousands of years in ascetic withdrawal, or in blissful union with the Goddess. Tantric texts often take the form of dialogues between the Goddess and the God during, or immediately following, their erotic play. It is often argued that it is through the practice of austerities that the tantric adept supercharges acts of (ritualised) sex.
Steps towards Sadhana
In seeking a distinct mode of sadhana for magical work with Ardhanishvara, I have drawn the following conclusions. My dissatisfaction with the theme of androgyny, as proposed in the work of Singer, Colgrave, et al, is that the categories of masculinity and femininity themselves are socially created and determined.
The tantric uses antinomian practices to go beyond that which society deems proper and acceptable. Hence one might usefully explore and experiment with blurring the categorisation of 'masculine' and 'feminine' behaviour, moods, and expressions, through cross-dressing, bhakti to a goddess or god, uncovering or creating selves of the 'opposite' or 'third' gender - these (and more) are all potentially useful routes to union and integration with the rejected, or 'hidden' other.
Ardhanishvara, as I noted above, can be understood as representing harmony, resolution and balance, in union. Also, we should note that this title can be translated as "the god who is half woman". One may read this as Shiva having projected Shakti, or Shakti having projected Shiva, depending on whether one takes a shaivite or shakti perspective of the image. This, I feel, is an important distinction to draw. There is a great deal of literature on the subject of men 'becoming' feminine, but as far as I know, not so much about women becoming 'masculine'. It also strikes me that there must be a significant difference between the male desire to explore or assume a psychic 'feminine' state, (in order to relate to the divine, or other men), and how women might approach the 'masculine' state - if indeed, they feel a need to at all.
Theorists of radical sexuality have pointed out that we tend to view ourselves as 'subjects', and others as 'objects'. Western consciousness is based on the 'objectification' of the 'other'. Harry Hay, one of the founders of the modern Gay Liberation Movement, proposed the idea of "Subject-Subject Consciousness". As I understand this principle, it means relating to others as equals - giving the same degrees of latitude - complexity and independence, that we ascribe to ourselves. This strikes me as a useful perspective for anyone, regardless of gender-preference, to work towards and one which I feel, reflects the image of Ardhanishvara. This places the emphasis on sadhana not so much in distinct magical acts in the circle or zonule, but in our everyday lives, in our relationships with others.
As for distinct forms of 'magical' work with Ardhanishvara, I would suggest meditation on the form of Ardhanishvara as the primordial flame which may be located variously - at the bindu point of a Yantra, or in each of the chakras. This nondual flame, which is both inward and outward, is the firepit into which all kleshas may be cast, as offerings to Shiva-Shakti. After all, it is these 'obstacles' which prevent us from experiencing the bliss of union which is both transcendent and imminent.